![]() ![]() The Vikings of Bjornstad's Viking Movie List - By date of release |
The Vikings (1958) | |
Great adventure and the one against which all Viking movies have to be compared. Costumes are too Hollywoodish and the castle is off by centuries, but the setting and depiction of the culture are reasonably accurate. Kirk Douglas does a pretty good Viking. Worth watching to see him run the oars of the long ship, without a stunt man or CGI. See the "Making of ..." on the DVD to see how much research they did. It's impressive for the time. To see more about why it may be the best Viking movie ever made, click here. | |
![]() The longship sails into a Norwegian fjord. |
![]() Einar returns home - with loot and a captured princess. |
![]() Village life. |
![]() Ragnar sailing through the fjords. |
![]() The feast. |
![]() Assaulting Aella's castle. |
Screen captures from The Vikings (1958) | |
![]() |
Noggin The Nog (1960) | |
![]() TV series from the UK, from 1960 until the mid-1970's. An animated, fictional children's series with Viking based story-lines and characters. (Art Newto) Image from www.nogginthenog.co.uk | |
![]() |
I na kamnyakh rastut derevya (And on the stone, the trees grow) AKA Dragens Fange (Dragon's Captive) (1985) | |
A Russian/Norwegian film. A young Slav (probably from the area around Novgorod) is taken prisoner by marauding Vikings as they believe him lucky. This movie is a surprising find – accurate in most aspects and filmed on location. It follows the group of Norsemen as they return to Norway after a sea battle and spend the winter in the local village. Most of the aspects of everyday life make an appearance in the movie, including: pagan worship, a witch, a chieftain and his influential wife, a slave, the chieftain’s son and his promised-in-marriage sister (including the strife over her), an outlaw and a ransom. Spoken Russian and Norwegian also add flavor to this movie. Worth seeing – If you can find it. (Milan Petricevic, esol777). Here's a YouTube link. (Dimitri Pirogov) | |
![]() The long ship closes for battle. |
![]() Sea battle - sea dragons face each other. |
![]() After an exchange of arrows and spears, the boats are lashed together and the combat gets personal. |
![]() Oars up. Vikings arrive at the Russian village. |
![]() Arrival in Norway to spend the winter after 'going Viking' |
![]() Weapons training of young warriors. |
Screen captures from I na kamnyakh rastut derevya (And on the stone, the trees grow) AKA Dragens Fange (Dragon's Captive) (1985) | |
![]() |
The 13th Warrior (1999) | |
Well staged, but an unsatisfying plot. Antonio Banderas portrays Ahmed ibn Fahdlan, based on a real Arab observer of (Rus) Viking culture. Fascinating depiction of a well-oiled and experienced Dark Age mercenary force. The Norsemen, among them Buliwyf (the leader) and Herger the Joyous, are unforgettable characters. Many good lines, well-delivered. Here's one: the Arab poet is tossed a huge sword. He complains, "I can't lift this." The Viking responds, "Grow stronger." Another: the Vikings position themselves to investigate a farmstead. The Arab incautiously moves forward. Rethel the Archer, bow half-drawn, warns, "Don't ... step in front of me." The armor spans centuries before and after the period. The swords are period-appropriate, but scaled up to hand-and-a-half size. Some of the best music in movie history. For a few reasons why this is one of the best Viking movies, click here. | |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Screen captures from The 13th Warrior (1999) | |
![]() |
Beowulf (1999) | |
Included here due only to the title. A futuristic version of the story. Christopher Lambert can't act in this one either. | |
![]() |
Troy (2004) | |
![]() |
![]() |
Screen captures from Troy (2004) | |
Nope, it's not a Viking age movie. The reason
Troy
is included here is that well choreographed sword and shield battles are
rare in the movies. The climactic battle between Achilles (Brad Pitt)
and Hector (Eric Bana) may be the best on film. The actors use their weapons
well; this is deadly work and their characters are the best at what they
do. Thanks to the choreography and editing we get to see them do
it. Their armor is effective: Hector strikes Achilles and might
have killed him but for the armor. Their shields make a difference
in the duel and aren't discarded at the first opportunity to turn the
battle into a sword-on-sword battle as in other movies. Both
characters' use of the shield for both offense and defense is directly
applicable to Viking age combat. One specific movement to watch
for: several times when Achilles begins an attack, he is already
moving his legs out of the way of the anticipated counter-attack.
It's a small thing, but it shows that the fight choreographer knows how
to set up the kind of fighting Vikings would readily connect with.
Excavated skeletons of warriors apparently killed in similar combat
frequently exhibit damage caused by sword cuts aimed below the shield
(e.g., the battle of Visby, 1361 AD.) As a further bonus in
Troy,
the combatants fight with spears, another rarity in film. Achilles'
adept use of the spear is particularly fascinating to watch. Richard Ryan
is listed as the sword master in movie's credits, but no one is
identified as the fight choreographer. Whoever is responsible has
done an amazing job. A last point: Few movies provide a
satisfying justification for one warrior's victory over another.
Here Achilles is shown not only to be a superb athlete, but also a
warrior who trains constantly. His success and fame aren't the
result of magic, mystical parentage or the script's requirements; here
he has earned them by adding hard work to natural ability. (Jack
Garrett) Since I like giving credit where it's due, here's a note from Mike W., one of our web page visitors: "Re: your accolades for the Achilles/Hector fight scene, Richard Ryan was in fact responsible for the fight choreography, as he did for all sword work for Troy. That particular fight scene was nominated for a Taurus (stunt award) and MTV Film award (ref: www.safd.org/user/18). Don't you just love that VERY memorable leaping/downward-thrust "kill move" of Achilles??? He was asked to develop special fight moves for each of the main characters to help reinforce their individual mythologies. "You'll be happy to know that Richard Ryan was also the Swordmaster, Asst. Stunt Coordinator, and Gabriel Byrne's stunt double for History's Vikings. How ironic, eh??? "You'll probably also be happy to know that he was stunt coordinator for Hammer Of the Gods (2013), which you've also referenced. "BTW, Richard has worked on quite a few highly memorable fight scenes since Troy, including winning a Screen Actors Guild Award as part of the stunt ensemble for The Dark Knight. How about that very memorable fight scene in Sherlock Holmes (2009), where Robert Downey Jr. is in a fight pit (slow-motion... Holmes analyzes his opponent to develop his winning series of moves... "break cracked ribs, traumatize solar plexus, dislocate jaw entirely..."). Richard was fight coordinator there, too. "Hope this was interesting!!" (Mike W.) Yes, Mike, it was!! (Jack Garrett) | |
![]() |
Super Moine (Super Monk) (2006) | |
![]() |
This short film should be seen by everyone who thinks Lindisfarne was a tragedy.
After watching it you may feel that the island monks were avenged.
Here's a link:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M3Yw-yYv0q0. Enjoy. (Therese Prieur) |
Screen capture from Super Moine (2006) | |
![]() |
Grendel (2007) | |
Don't forget the "based on the poem" version
(insert sarcasm here) Sci-Fi doozy "Grendel" with a mad as a hatter Deanna Troi as the queen and a
Fred Flintstone Order of the Sacred Buffalo Grand Poobah helmet wearing Beowulf ... and don't forget his fully
automatic exploding crossbow!! (Brian Gannaway) This one is so bad I took notes while I watched it. Extended really snarky comments here. (Jack Garrett) |
![]() |
![]() |
1066 AKA 1066: The Battle for Middle Earth (2009) | |
This two-part UK television mini-series depicts the three momentous battles of 1066 from the viewpoint of the lower eschelons of the three warring armies: Anglo-Saxon, Viking and Norman. For those interested in historical re-enactment, the film is a must, although greater attention to William of Normandy, Harold Godwinson and Harald Hardrada would have made a better educational experience. Extras were provided by Regia Anglorum and the battle scenes have a different look than other films that rely on CGI or generic stunt players to fill the frame. The budget is limited, but the screenplay and acting are both well beyond most similar efforts. An attempt to tap into the success of the Lord of the Rings movies is unfortunate and undermines the substantial lengths taken for historical authenticity. Extended comments and screen shots are here, since the film isn't generally available in the US. These comments are based on the DVD Region 2 (Europe) version. | |
![]() The Normans. |
![]() The Anglo-Saxons. |
Screen captures from 1066: The Battle for Middle Earth (2009) | |
![]() |
Hammer of the Gods AKA Thor: Hammer of the Gods(2009) | |
A Viking warrior named Thor searches for a mythical hammer from his visions. Runs into werewolves. An abysmal TV movie. | |
![]() |
Thor (2011) | |
Thor works. It's an entertaining movie with interesting characters and, considering it's derived from a comic book universe, it has a reasonably involving plot. The story has some nice character development as Thor Odinsson learns lessons that will serve him well when he succeeds his father as king. A central idea is that magic, science and religion are all different ways of perceiving the same phenomena. It even refers to, without quoting, my favorite Arthur C. Clarke observation: "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic." | |
![]() Image from imdb.com |
Probably as important as the movie's story line is the person
chosen to portray the title character. Chris
Hemsworth plays Thor and he seems an ideal choice for the role. He certainly looks the part and
handles the acting requirements pretty well. Considering the fact he
shares the screen with Anthony Hopkins, that is not a mean feat.
Hemsworth even does comedy; there a couple of occasions when Thor's
inflated sense of his own worth suffers some deflation and he manages
them very well. On the other hand, the actor Tom Hiddleston, playing the pivotal role of
Loki, never achieves much of an impact. A real missed opportunity. As
we know from the Batman movies, the villain makes all the difference. Keeping in mind that we discuss Viking movies on this site, I should note there is a shot of a Norwegian village around 954 AD. For about four seconds. In the dark. And the movie uses the names of a dozen Norse gods, locations and artifacts. That's about it for the Viking content. |
The realm of Asgard as shown
in the movie deserves some comment. I never imagined that the home of
the Norse gods might suffer from urban sprawl. Or at least I think it
does, since the "cityscape" we see might be office towers, apartment
buildings, cell phone antennas, space ports or maybe discarded egg
crates. And they may be connected by streets or canals or bike paths or
... nothing. We just never see any of it close-up. As far as we know,
the "Asgardians" (the movie's term), just get together in a large hall
for Odin's occasional pronouncements. Other than that we never learn
anything about them. There are a LOT of them, though.
The bridge between the realms, Bifrost, is conceived with middling results. It looks like it would be more at home in the Flash Gordon movie from 1980. But then, so would Thor's costumes and most of the characters. Thor suffers from the continuing problem CGI-intensive movies seem unwilling to resolve. When computer-generated entities fight, there is simply no sense of jeopardy created. Characters in Thor are battered, impaled and frozen, all with no lasting damage. Without being told what would actually damage or kill the combatants, we have to assume that nothing we see is going to hurt them. This prevents the most intense battles from generating any suspense, reducing them to an exercise in how many ways animators can batter a hero before bringing the increasingly pointless combat to a conclusion. In the movie, Thor even compounds the problem by telling us how effortless an epic battle against the frost giants is for him. It's interesting to note that in the early days of monster movies, filmmakers always found a way to explain to the audience what would kill the vampire, werewolf, mummy or whatever. One way or another, we would learn what kind of wooden stake, silver bullet or holy water weapon to be on the lookout for. Otherwise, the death of a combatant can only appear to be at the whim of the script. We may get a surprise, but there certainly won't be any suspense leading up to it. We're cheated of much of the nerve-wracking excitement a well choreographed battle should bring. A second flaw Thor (the movie) has is the minion problem. The gods of Asgard slaughter dozens (hundreds?) of frost giants who are never even mentioned as losses - by either side. Even the ruler of the frost giants later discusses an end to the hostilities without the slightest mention of how many of his kind were lost. Those sent into battle should matter - to someone. It cheats us of the emotions that should rise out of the loss of a real person/entity, even an enemy. These vanquished frost giants are given no more reality than a kill counter in a video game. In the end, it's just a movie made about a comic book hero. Not much more, and no less. Click here to see Bjornstad interviewed about the movie for the Electric Company media web site. | |
![]() |
The Saga of Biorn (2011) | |
![]() Screen capture from The Saga of Biorn (2011) |
Short animated movie about an old viking, who wants to die with honour, so he can go to Valhalla. The story is pretty entertaining and the twist at the end is great. The animation looks great, I highly recommend it – and if you don’t like it, it’s very short. Here's the link: http://vimeo.com/18011143 (Allan Loftager) |
![]() |
Northmen (2012) | |
Why did he do that? For a 20 minute movie, the
question comes up surprisingly often in this tiny independent film. We
don't find out the whys - there just isn't time or effort expended on
backstories. The setting is the aftermath of English king Æthelræd's St. Brice's Day massacre in 1002 and the retaliation by the Danish king Sweyn Forkbeard. Five Vikings are left behind by their retreating forces. The film depicts what happens to them. The costuming, including the rebated swords and butted, round cross-section mail will be familiar to re-enactors. The mail itself is a focus of the film, and should probably get a listing in the cast. Fight choreography is only fair, with action not crucial to the plot filmed well while more significant actions are poorly done. Too often we are left wondering where the weapon landed and how serious the wound was. And perhaps the reference to there being a plot is an overstatement. The entire plot could be summarized in a short sentence or two, if we wanted to spoil everything for you. The main complaint (other than there not being much dramatic point to the whole effort), is how the swords are used against the mail, especially with rounded points. On the other hand, this is the first film I've ever watched and then checked the credits to see who did the sound. Nicely done. You can watch it here: http://www.urbanapachefilms.com/2012/08/northmen/ | |
![]() England is proving to be a struggle for the invading Vikings |
![]() It's not too pleasant for the native Anglo-Saxons, either |
Screen captures from Northmen (2012) | |
![]() |
Northmen: A Viking Saga (2014) | |
"A group of Vikings is stranded on the Scottish
coast. The path to safety is deadly - as a cruel enemy has
already started the hunt for the Norsemen. "A troop of marauding Vikings, under the command of the young Asbjörn is heading for Britain's coast to plunder the gold treasures on the island of Lindisfarne. However, the Norsemen are caught in a heavy storm, which shatters their dragon boat on the rocks off Scotland. Stranded in the far reaches of the opponent's hinterland, their only means of survival is to make it to the Danelaw Viking fortress. Only with the support of Conall, a mysterious monk who prays with his sword, they beat a bloody swathe through the ranks of all those who stand in their way. Mercilessly pursued, the warriors travel through an unknown and hostile land, with the Scottish king and his mercenaries, the dreaded wolf pack, on their heels. But the belligerent Vikings set deadly traps for their pursuers and slaughter them mercilessly. For now the hunters are now the hunted ..." Adapted from http://www.spielfilm.de/kino/2997887/northmen-a-viking-saga.html A German/Swiss/South African film. Our collective opinion: Not bad, just not very good. It's a chase movie, with improbable things happening (Where'd they get those saddles?) just to serve the plot. |
![]() Image from https://www.facebook.com/NorthmenMovie |
![]() |
Viking: The Berserkers (2014) | |
![]() |
In Dark Ages Britain, a group of young Saxons are captured by a clan of fearsome Viking warriors and used as prey in a ritualistic manhunt. (imdb.com) Viking version of The Hunger Games. Or something like that. I haven't seen The Hunger Games. (Judit Stettner) Image from here. |
![]() |
Guillaume - La Jeunesse du Conquérant (William - The Youth of the Conqueror) (2015) | |
![]() |
A movie made in France about the youth of William the Conqueror. The teaser is here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CUSiXgroX0g (Therese Prieur) Screen capture from Guillaume - La Jeunesse du Conquérant (2013) |
![]() |
Shieldmaiden: An animation in progress (2015) | |
![]() Screen capture from Shieldmaiden |
From the creator, Vilhelm Bergendal: " Shieldmaiden is a personal animation project born out of my love for viking folklore. It follows the adventures of Rota the young warrior girl, as she travels the world of Midgard in search of her Grandfather’s lost treasure. The setting is very much inspired from John Bauer’s dark forests, and from Scandinavian folklore and myths." "Although some excellent stories have been told about the historical vikings, many more about “fantasy Vikings” , and even more about the Nordic gods – I feel there aren’t many stories that portray the Viking world like THEY saw it. Very few Viking stories show the original Nordic folklore, the stories and creatures that Scandinavians grow up with and inspired many of today’s big fantasy worlds." You can see the first part of the pilot here. You can donate to help its completion here. |
![]() |
Viking (2016) | |
Viking is misnamed. It's not about a Viking. There ARE Vikings in the movie, but they are almost always peripheral to the events onscreen. It IS the story of Prince
Vladimir the Great who converted Russia to Christianity in 988
AD. He's the
third and youngest son of Svetoslav, head of the Rurik clan of the Rus, who ruled in what are now parts of Ukraine, Western Russia and Belarus. The death of Svetoslav in
972 leaves the three sons with competing regions: Yaropolk holds Kiev, Oleg holds an area known as Drevlyane and the youngest, Vladimir, has Novgorod. In the ancient
and honored tradition of princely detente, Yaropolk murders Oleg, and Vladimir's supporters murder Yaropolk. Vladimir hires Vikings to help him take and hold his father's
lands - and maybe add some more. The story culminates with Vladimir's conversion of the Rus to Christianity. In between, there's a lot of mud, blood and snow. A LOT of mud. Viking is based on the historical document Primary Chronicle, the history of the Swedish Rus from about 850 to 1110, originally compiled in Kiev about 1113, and the Icelandic sagas of the Norwegian kings. The main problem with the version we saw - with English subtitles - was the poor quality of the translation into English. The subtitles were frequently badly worded and confusing, making it difficult to follow people and incidents. People pop up in the movie, check off their boxes from recorded history and then disappear, sometimes never to reappear. Scenes play out suggesting Vladimir's historical progression towards Christianity. We aren't really invited along. We just witness disconnected events, like his yearning to marry Anna, the sister of the Byzantine emperor Basil II. Was this part of some developing geo-political savvy on his part? Or are we really to believe it was because his brother's stunning widow, Irena, gave him a bracelet with "Anna" on it? We certainly aren't able to witness a single conversation or interior monologue about the project. Or see its outcome onscreen. |
![]() Poster image from twitchfilm.com, Screenshots from the trailer |
Discouraged by their ineffectiveness, Vladimir pulls down the totems to his father's gods and replaces them with another totem. It's not clear whether it represents the
Christian god or (more likely) another pagan deity. Another pagan god is mentioned, but it's not clear who the ever-present and perpetually muddy "priests" represent. We
do know they like sacrifices, though. There are rousing battles, sieges, longships and a berserker. The battles are well-staged and epic in scale. Did I mention the mud? There are truly ridiculous moments, not the least of which involve portaging the longships to hilltops, then mudsurfing them downhill to attack the Pecheneg horse-borne invaders. A minor historical point the filmmakers chose not to include to avoid cluttering the story: Vladimir was believed to have collected eight hundred concubines as well as a few wives during his busy reign. For good or ill, the movie spends most of its time outdoors. The scale armor is ineffective, since pretty frequently warriors are killed while wearing it. The armor, helmets and the costuming are the same dull, dreary stuff we're seeing everywhere in movies and in TV series, no matter the culture or time period. Along those lines, being a Slavic/Rus prince must not pay well. Vladimir doesn't seem to have a habitation worthy of his title or a dress-up tunic. All we see are essentially combat outfits or undertunics. Irena - and a few Byzantine ambassadors - are the only ones who dress to fit their stations in the film. At one point, Vladimir has to take up a collection to hire the Vikings (Varangians?) as mercenaries. The sum total of the jewelry and coinage available to his people is enough to impress the Vikings sufficiently to rent him ONE Viking. A clear case of wage inflation in the 10th century. Ultimately a disappointing experience. It could easily have been better. Maybe by actually focusing on the Vikings... Here's the trailer. Thanks to Colin Adams and Ed Berland for the heads up. | |
![]() The aurochs hunt explodes from the tree line. A brilliantly filmed scene. |
![]() The father of the betrothed has a reluctant daughter. |
![]() Polotsk has seceded from the Byzantine Empire. Vladimir agrees to apply pressure - for a price. |
![]() Viking determination - and a great helmet. |
![]() A quiet sail upriver. |
![]() Changing of the gods in an open air temple. |
![]() Every historical movie is allowed one really crappy helmet. This one is Vladimir's. |
![]() A berserker at work. |
![]() |
Vikingane AKA Norsemen (2016) | |
![]() |
![]() |
Images from the Vikingane trailer | |
An 8th century comic soap opera - with swords and axes. Why
not? Filmed in Norway by Norwegian television. Two seasons
of episodes have been released.
The series is being filmed in both Norwegian and English with bilingual actors
handling two completely separate versions. "Viking is an epic and humorous drama series set in the Viking Age. The year is 790 ... we follow the everyday life of the Vikings in the village Norheim. Between power struggle, raids and battles in a tough time offers life of good friendship, celebration and love, while being challenged by new modern trends with the introduction of soft values and art, bickering and jealousy, relationship problems and troublesome sibling relationship we know from modern times." Quote from https://tv.nrk.no/serie/vikingane Good - in its own way. It looks great, from settings to costuming. But, it's basically a winking look at Viking culture with the characters representing 21st century outlooks using a full range of our current politically correct and incredibly trite clichés. Enjoyable if you're in the right mood. | |
![]() |
The Last King AKA Birkebeinerne (2016) | |
Here's a story based on actual Norwegian history. In 1206, two factions fight for the Norwegian throne.
The Baglers are supported by Denmark and the Catholic church; their opponents include the son of the dead king Håkon Sverreson. Unfortunately, the claimant for
the throne, Håkon Håkonsson, is just two years old. After an attempt on the child's life, two members of the Birkebeiner fighters take the boy on a long and
perilous journey of over 225 miles through treacherous mountains and forests. "Birkebeiner" refers to the group's supposed bare-bones origins when they wore birch
bark leggings or shoes. Cross-country ski races still commemorate the chase. The acting is fair, but not much more, and the writing is occasionally stilted, but the movie looks great and the story is involving. At least some of the actors seem to have been dubbed, but the English version doesn't suffer from it. Torstein, one of the primary characters, is played by Kristofer Hivju, the red-bearded Wildling leader from Game of Thrones. The central story is the chase and the filming of the movie is excellent. There's more ski combat than in a James Bond movie. Here, a wide array of weaponry from the period is deployed, all in snow on skis. Other things worth noting that make an appearance: fjord horses, a cart, a sleigh, a sauna, a cranked lute (Hurdy Gurdy?), a mouth harp and the Northern Lights. It's set a bit later than the usual movie on this list, but 1066 didn't abruptly end the Viking Age in Scandinavia. One of the better "Viking" movies we've seen. Incidently, a children's book based on this same incident is on our Bjornstad Recommended Reading List. | |
![]() Skjervald and Torstein set out to save the young Håkon Håkonsson. |
![]() |
Image from IMDB.com and screen capture from The Last King | |
![]() |
Redbad (2018) | |
Redbad is nearly a good movie. At two hours and forty minutes, it’s certainly epic. The setting looks accurate, the scale is enormous,
and the battles involve hundreds of extras. Redbad is a Frisian prince in the 8th century. (Note the DVD packaging says, “In the year of 754 AD” before launching
into a summary of the movie. Since Redbad died in 719 AD, a movie featuring him 35 years later would be pretty dull.) The Frisian people are pagan, and the Christian Franks are pressing hard for domination of their lands. The Danish Vikings live alongside the Frisians on the shore of the North Sea and offer occasional military support. Redbad through much of the movie is a reluctant character. He doesn’t want the leadership of his people and is against sacrifices to their pagan gods, but doesn’t press the issue, preferring to wander away while things go from bad to worse. Reluctant heroes just don’t make great cinema. Events – and the action – usually flow around them. The audience is forced to wait for some crisis to happen that finally turns things around. Being tied up, set adrift on a raft and then saved by Vikings while his sister is married off to a Frankish prince does it for Redbad. The fighting for, and around, the village of Dorestad forces him to become a leader. The filmmakers decided (as told in the “Making of…” extra) that they would make the Christians the villains of the piece. This results in a real headscratcher. The film opens with Frisians sacrificing a lot of people - in fire - because of a crop failure. This is contrasted later in the film with two Christian baptisms. Those conversions are filmed as if being forcibly dunked in a vat of water by an ugly priest was more terrifying than being burned alive. Ya gotta be kidding. Just to intensify the “Us vs. Them” aspect, the Franks all speak in English in the movie. Everyone else, Dane or Frisian, speaks in subtitled Dutch. It’s a weird decision; with the three cultures in close contact throughout the movie, you’re frequently left with trying to guess which bearded long greasy-haired character you’re listening to. The combat is of a style I’d call “Sword cutting”. There just isn’t much fighting done by the lead characters. Their opponents attack, thoughtfully move their swords and shields out of the way and are dispatched with a single neat slice that allows the kill count to go up without all that messy choreography. A lot of people are killed in the battles, but it appears the coach didn’t stress Defense in the locker room. A great deal is made of shield walls. We see them formed and attacked in several battles. Ironically, with two shield walls drawn up against each other on the battlefield, the Frisians and Vikings break ranks and charge the Franks’ (kite) shield wall. No idea why – it wasn’t a good idea. We see a lot of longships; all except one show their sails lowered, whether they are sailing, anchored or docked. That would have made for exciting times when the wind came up. The clothing is invented for the movie. The notes say 2,000 costumes were created for it. According to the director, Roel Reiné, he didn’t want to make a “frumpy and dry historical film”. He “quickly abandoned the desire to make it realistic” and went for “bigger than life.” Gee, what a brave decision. All in all, a movie worth watching if just to fill in a little missing history with a fairly accurate retelling. There are Vikings, but there’s no raiding, treasure collection or exploring and precious little sailing. So, a Frisian, and not Viking, movie. Here's the trailer: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fLfz6m6v6No |
![]() ![]() ![]() images from Redbad |
![]() |
Beforeigners (2019) | |
![]() image from imdb.com |
A comedy-drama television series developed in Norway and in limited release worldwide. People from three past ages: the Stone Age, the Viking Age and the 1800's, walk out of the ocean into modern Oslo knowing nothing about how they got there. One of the Viking women becomes a police officer, with the inevitable culture clashes. Here's a link to episode 1 (not in English, as far as I know at this point.) Thanks to Lyonel Perabo for the entry. |
![]() |
Rune of the Dead AKA Viking Saga: Rune of the Dead (2019?) | |
An announced Swedish movie with nothing more than a dark clip to generate interest. Here's the Facebook page. |
![]() image from Facebook |
![]() |
Valhalla (2019) | |
![]() Image from imdb.com | |
A Danish live
action movie which is an adaptation of the old comic books of the
same name, but darker and grimier. It seems at least in some part
to take ideas from the tale of two servants of Thor. "The Viking children Røskva and Tjalfe embark on an adventurous journey from Midgard to
Valhalla with the gods Thor and Loki. Life in Valhalla, however, turns out to be threatened by the dreaded Fenrir wolf and the god's barbaric archenemies,
the Jotnar. Side by side with the gods the two children must fight to save Valhalla from the end of the world - Ragnarok."—Profile Pictures.
Here's a captioned link to the trailer. Will have to track this one down. First reactions to it seem pretty negative, though. (Thanks to Lyonel Perabo and Roderic Oswald) | |
![]() |
Pagan Warrior AKA Vikings vs Krampus (2019) | |
Vikings fight Saxons, then a mythical beast. Set in 812 AD, or maybe, as the titles announce, "Three Days Until Yule Day December 1812". Somehow, life will be complete without having to sit through this one. At your own risk, here's a link to the trailer. (And thanks, anyway, to Lyonel Perabo) |
![]() image from imdb.com |
![]() |
The Northman (2022) The Northman is based on a tale told by 13th century Danish historian, theologian and author Saxo Grammaticus in Gesta Danorum, (The Story of the Danes). That story was adapted by Shakespeare for Hamlet. The similarities collapse in a heap pretty quickly, though. Compared to Amleth's struggles with his lot in life in The Northman, Hamlet was a carefree lightweight. The settings of the story and the costumes are exceptional. Small details, like the tortoise shell brooches on the He-witch are dead on (suggesting the “feminine” aspect of magic). He also wields an archaeologically accurate Völva's staff. Other nice touches include the unstepped mast while rowing the longships upriver and the mast-fish (to brace the mast when in use) shown within the longship. Nordic and Slavic people have recognizably different clothing, decorations and, occasionally, language. The Icelandic vistas are stunning, the weapons generally correct except for some sound effects like loud scraping metal on metal as a sword is slowly drawn from a leather covered wooden scabbard. Other artifacts in the film looked good as well: pots, chains, looms, Viking ship interior, exterior household goods. (Henrik Olsgaard) Norse mythology plays a vital part in the movie and it is truly entertaining to recognize the many subtle – or blatant - references to Norse gods, locations and objects. Dr. Jackson Crawford has posted several videos on The Northman. That, in itself, may be a comment on the film's impact on those of us who care about this era. He notes that the Younger Futhark runes used for the chapter titles and the Elder Futhark runes shown on the sword Amleth takes from a draugr (undead) are generally correct, but not completely. Dr. Crawford seems to be pretty forgiving about this considering the number and quality of the experts whose research is shown in the movie. We’re with him. I'm impressed with the many, many accurate references to Norse culture, mythology, weaponry, settings and clothing. Including a brutal stickball game of Knattleikr. But I've been searching for a way to describe my primary reaction to it. For those of us interested in Viking movies, it's definitely one worth experiencing and absorbing, but maybe the problem is simple: It's just not an "enjoyable" movie. It gives the increasingly over-used movie description “dark” a new, further, place to go. Vast expanses of Iceland are made to feel claustrophobic and confining. The journey toward vengeance seems doomed, unfulfilling and inevitable. It’s an epic without adventure. For more about The Northman, check out this excellent review: https://www.scandinavianarchaeology.com/film-review-the-northman/ | |
![]() The warm glow of childhood memories. |
![]() Uncle Fjölnir heads off the competition. |
![]() It may not be Oðinn, but there are similarities.... |
![]() Wolves - and Ulfheðnar - hunt in packs. |
![]() Someone's going to end up in the mud. |
![]() Although the runestone depicts Oðinn, representations of the Norse god carved in stone are rare and usually difficult to identify with certainty. |
![]() Vengeance at the Gates of Hel. The not-so-Norse hot one. |
![]() The Valkyrie takes our hero to Valhalla. Bifrost, the Rainbow Bridge, should be around somewhere... |
Screen captures from The Northman (2022) | |
![]() |
Röde Orm AKA Red Snake AKA The Long Ships (Maybe?) | |
![]() |
"Danish film producer Peter Aalbaek Jensen has announced that Röde Orm, meaning
'red snake', will be adapted into a movie. 'This will be the first good Viking movie ever.',
says Aalbeak Jensen. Frans G. Bengtsson (1894 – 1954) published the beloved two-part adventure novel in 1941
and 1945. The book is about a Viking named Orm, or Red Orm because of the colour of his hair. Orm, a name meaning
snake or serpent, is captured by plundering Vikings but befriends his enemies and helps them raid a fortress in
France. He becomes a slave in Spain, but returns to Denmark and visits Harald Bluetooth for Christmas. Later, Orm
becomes a Christian in England, moves to Sweden and starts a family. He takes his son on a journey to find a huge
treasure that his brother has hidden. ... "In 1963, Jack Cardiff directed an English-Yugoslavian film adaption, the hugely popular The Long Ships, starring Richard Widmark, Sidney Poitier, Russ Tamblyn and Rosanna Schiaffino. That film kept only a few things from the books. "Röde Orm tells the adventurous story of one of the greatest heroes of the Viking era, which leads to a journey that changes the course of history. The filming of Frans Gunnar Bengtsson's Röde Orm ... is the most ambitious Nordic Viking film project ever." The planned release date is 31 December 2017... Thanks to Thomas Mason for the addition to the list. |
Image and text adapted from http://vikingmoviesinfo.wordpress.com/2014/05/22/skarsgard-to-play-red-snake/ and https://www.moviezine.se/movies/rode-orm | |
![]() |
Runestone: A Possible Television Series (Maybe?) | |
It is the end of the 9th Century. Determined to find his missing son who has not been seen since leaving on a voyage of discovery years earlier, and intrigued by rumors of new lands rich with resources, a Viking lord gathers his countrymen and sails three massive longboats into unknown waters. After a powerful storm at sea, they make landfall in the New World. This is a series being put together in Oregon, but does not yet have a distribution deal or broadcast channel. Thanks to Ed Berland for the heads up. |
![]() Image from roadsendfilms.com |
There are a couple of videos and some photos here: http://roadsendfilms.com/runestone/about.htm and here: http://vimeopro.com/roadsend/roadsendfilms/video/98787205 | |
![]() |
Beowulf: A Syfy Television Series (Maybe?) | |
![]() |
"Syfy is delving into the world of fantasy with a new TV series based on the epic poem 'Beowulf.' "According to Entertainment Weekly, the logline for the new series is an adaptation of the classic epic poem that further examines the hero's rise to power and his feud with the monster Grendel." Considering there's plenty of fodder already in the 3,000-line Old English tale, it's easy to see how Syfy expanding the world would allow a great TV series to unfold. "With shows like 'Merlin' well received by fans, it's easy to see the space 'Beowulf' could hold in the television landscape. This new series will be written by Matt Greenberg (best known for the films "1408" and "Reign of Fire") and producers Greenburg, Brian Hamilton, Michael Chechik, Andrew Cosby and Paulo de Oliveira. "Previously Syfy made a TV movie called 'Grendel' in 2007." Text and image from Zapit.com. Thanks to Ed Berland for the addition to the list.It's possible this could be a good series offering an authentic view of near-Viking culture. Not a bet I'd want to make, though. With the development of Beowulf: Return to the Shieldlands, the odds we'll see this one have gotten longer. |
![]() |
King Harald (Maybe?) | |
"Warner Bros has made a
preemptive acquisition of King Harald, a pitch that Mark L. Smith is writing as a potential vehicle for Leonardo DiCaprio. The subject: Harald Hardrada,
the 11th Century conqueror who has been called the last great Viking king.
"King Harald will be produced by DiCaprio and his Appian Way partner Jennifer Davisson Killoran. King Harald was King of Norway for two decades, but his quest for power and thirst for battle led to his being exiled for a time to Russia and then returning in triumph. The film envisioned is a Braveheart-style story. DiCaprio, a history buff, has long been interested in headlining a Viking movie; he had once circled a film about Viking warriors that Mel Gibson was to direct." This is as promising as it gets in the movie industry - initially. Which, of course, usually means years of anticipation slowly sliding into forgetful disinterest. |
Warner Bros, Appian Way Set Pitch For Viking Epic On ‘King Harald’ ![]() From www.deadline.com By Mike Fleming Jr Tuesday August 6, 2013 @ 2:36pm PDT |
![]() |
1066 (Maybe?) | |
![]() Image from http://1066themovie.biz |
British director Robin Jacob (mainly historical documentaries) and
his production team have
been working on this for over five years. It's hard to tell
if the project is gaining momentum, though. The materials available about
the movie (e.g., a trailer and some shots of a 2008 re-enactor
event) are of wobbly quality and aren't completely encouraging that
the movie will actually be filmed and released. The trailer
shows a single spear-wielding Norman charging at the home-movie
video camera from across a field. In slow motion. That's
it. They have a script, based on "Harold the King - The Story of the Battle of Hastings" by Helen Hollick. They have a list of actors who have signed on and an intention to rely more on re-enactors than CGI for the battle scenes. They have an interview with the director about the movie. (He wears sunglasses throughout, even though it's filmed indoors. Annoying.) There are a couple of links: http://1066themovie.biz/intro.htm and http://www.facebook.com/HaroldGodwinsson We wish them well. 1066 as a significant date in history needs a well-made large-scale movie. Nice poster. But then, the Wenceslas helmet always looks good. |
![]() |
Erik and the Gods (Maybe?) | |
This is a Viking film project in its very early stages. Edith Tvede Byg-Fabritius, a Danish film director, screenwriter and producer, is trying to get crowd sourcing to make a teaser that would develop support for a 35-minute prolog to develop support for one or more movies. The source material is the Danish four-volume book series, Erik Menneskesøn, about the teenage boy Erik, his travels through Norse mythology and Ragnarok, the war between the two families of gods that will end the world. Here's a link to the impressive approach the director has taken for the film. We wish the project the best and thanks to Joron Whitton for sending the link. | |
![]() |